In all the years that I have been doing what i do, there have
been very few occasions when i have questioned the morality of my role. I
believe that i provide a service that helps people to open up to their partners
and discuss their relationships free of the lies that affairs create. Most
people, after the initial shock of discovery, relish the chance to rid
themselves of the guilt that has burdened them and seize the opportunity to
make right the things they perceived were wrong in their relationships.
However, there is one case (also famous for being the
shortest case in our history at just 24 minutes start to finish!) that stands
out in my mind as being the closest i have come to questioning whether what i
do is right.
The client call came through at around 1130hrs. The job was
a simple one; follow his wife during her lunch break to ease his suspicions
about her relationship with her boss. He was insistent that his suspicions
would be unfounded and laughed at the idea of even proceeding, but still, he
had a nagging doubt that he couldn't put aside and thus we took the details and
agreed to feedback following the operation.
Leaving the office, we all believed that this would simply
be another hour or two of fruitless surveillance whereupon we could put the
clients fears to rest, but this wasn't to be the case. Shortly after arriving
at the targets workplace, she appeared alone and was observed walking across
the car park. She paused by a 4x4 vehicle and was soon joined by a man who had
left the office a minute or two after her. They both climbed into the vehicle,
her in the passenger seat and set off, soon blending into the lunchtime
traffic. After a few minutes of mobile surveillance, the targets pulled into an
area of woodland and shut off the engine. We parked 100 yards or so further
down the road and doubled back to scope out an observation point from which we
could gather photos.
From our position, we could clearly see and document that
target and her associate (who was later confirmed to be her boss) had climbed
into the rear of the vehicle and were engaged in sexual activity. At this
point, we contacted the client to confirm whether or not he wanted us to break
cover to get more a detailed image from inside the car - the target and her
associate had dropped down below the window line and thus more detailed pictures
would mean standing immediately next to the car shooting in and down. He confirmed
that yes, he wanted close up faces and actions documented and thus the order
was given to break cover.
We moved quickly back to our vehicle and repositioned it
immediately adjacent to the target car. The target and her associate obviously
spotted us jumping out but were unable to respond fast enough to our cameras at
the windows and thus, our job was done. We got into our car and sped off back
to the office leaving them in little doubt that they had just been caught red
handed.
The preparation of the report and the download of the images
took around 30 minutes and after a quick lunch, we were on our way to the
client house to present our findings. He was devastated and told us that he
would confront and then leave his wife upon her return. As we left, we met a
lady coming in with two happy children in tow. As i passed them on the drive, i
thought back to the report i had just handed their father, the report that presented
their mothers betrayal, the report that heralded the breakdown of their family
unit.
At that point, i wondered whether or not we had done the
right thing. Would the affair have just fizzled out in time with no harm done,
would it have just been a passing phase that left no-one any the wiser?
On the way back to the office, i called the client and told
him that he should give himself time to digest the information before
confronting his wife. We talked for around 20 minutes and concluded with him
agreeing to stay with his father for a day or two to think things through.
As it transpired, after this period of reflection the client
agreed to attend counselling sessions with his wife. As a result, they stayed
together, worked through their problems and i am told that they are now as
strong as ever. The family stayed together.
Most couples dont separate on the mere suspicion of an affair,
most need irrefutable proof and irrefutable proof is what we provided during
that day in the woods. So the question that i find myself asking is this: Had
the couple of split up based on our evidence for an affair that, like most, may
have died out in time without anyone ever knowing about it, would we have been
partly to blame for the breakdown of that family...?
2 comments:
Hard to say but I feel the truth is always best , you can move forward constructively from a position of truth.
I wonder out of all the people who contact your company , how many are right in their suspicions about their partners fidelity? I suspect that unfortunately most people's suspicions are confirmed ... intuition !
Very good.
Thank you.
Post a Comment